Lights In The Sky

 

Billy Meier & How The Con Works

 

Above is a screenshot of a blog article by Michael Horn, Billy Meier's authorized U.S. spokesperson. It claims that Billy Meier foresaw the Turkey-Syria eartquakes of February 6. Actually, he didn't. When the news came out that day I checked the FIGU main website as well as Horn's blog. There was zero information on the devastating earthquakes. Nothing was "prophecized" or "predicted." But lo and behold a week orso later Meier's contact report 833 claims that Meier "predicted" the earthquakes. The date of the alleged report was given as February the 3rd. 3 days before the event!

This is how the con works. Simply backdate! Write a report after the event and claim the date of it was before the event. This is how Meier tries to establish his reputation as a "prophet" or an extraordinary human being with great foresight and spiritual powers. Below is a screenshot of when the 833th contact report of a giant database of Meier's contact stories was published. The last edit was February the 15th! Nothing before the actual event on the 6th. This is how frauds like Billy Meier and Michael Horn operate. Don't believe me? Next time after an important world event take screenshots of the aforementiond website(s) and you'll magically see how Billy Meier "prophesized" it (later on). He's a one-trick p(h)ony!

Billy Meier & The Art Of Polishing A Turd

 Once you get into the Billy Meier UFO case information it becomes apparent that he has an enormous hatred and jealousy of George Adamski. And he actually met the man in Switzerland while on lecture but somehow reached a highly negative judgement about George Adamski's character even though the latter was kind to him. Yet, as usual, there's more. Michael Horn was so kind to make a file. Here are a few excerpts to make my point.

Ptaah: 501. You know a guy named George Adamski, right? 

Billy: You know him, you have told me about him several times. I also know him personally from before, when he was at the Volkshaus in Zurich in May 1959. I did not get the best impression of him then, although I had to talk to him with an interpreter because I did not speak English at that time. I noticed, however, that the man was dominated by a tremendous stubbornness and by a great egoism that seemed unusual to me, but which was supposed to be covered up by an almost perfectly acted kindness and charity. I found that the man had an extraordinary gift for persuasion and suggestion and always knew how to take over the conversation. It was clear that he had fallen for an ideal and was exploiting it in his own favour with a feigned help for the oppressed. So also fighting injustice seemed to me to be only acted by him and everything only to put himself in the centre. It seemed to me that in the first and last place for him only his own needs were always predominant, and that from the big toe up to the last tip of his hair. I had the impression at the time that in every respect he was only ever concerned with his own ego and his own well-being, which he directed into the highest channels through a tremendous power of imagination and suggestion. He also seemed to me to be dominated by the will to want to be first in every relationship and also to want to take the lead in every relationship. 

Ptaah: 502. You have observed and analysed the man very carefully, which apparently no Earth human being has ever been able to do before. 

Wow, so only Meier and Ptaah are able to see it. What are the odds? Gets even worse.

Billy: … n the 57th Contact of the 23rd of June 1976 Semjase told me that within a year she would bring me an original document from George Adamski in which he had admitted that his UFO concerns were only fraud and charlatanry. Semjase actually brought me a document, but it was only a copy, which I also lost in a strange way. But I never received the original document. 

Ptaah: 94. That is correct. 

95. Adamski's document actually existed, but it was destroyed by the person who had it in custody because he/she did not want Adamski to be exposed posthumously as a fraud. 

96. So our people who were responsible for getting the document could no longer get their hands on it, but had to be content with the photocopy given to you, which by the way was stolen from you by H. Jacob when you gave it to him for inspection and he gave you back an empty folded paper. 

97. He did not keep the document himself, but passed it on to that source which we still could not fathom. 

So Meier had the "evidence" but for the umpteenth time it got lost... ? Meier's photo negatives and films got lost as well! As with Meier's claim that he found the original Bible in a tomb in Israel! And at the same time Meier and his alleged ETs have the balls to use the word "truth." So, how do you polish an intellectual turd of thought? With lies upon lies upon lies...

Billy Meier's Henoch Prophecies - A Closer Look

Billy Meier claims to be a Prophet in contact with extraterrestrials but what are these prophecies actually made off? How are they constructed? Lets take a look at the Henoch Prophecies in Billy Meier's contact report 215.

Quetzal; 

"Before I give you a clear account of the prophecies of Henoch, I would like to point out that prophecies are always changeable and can be changed for the better if man makes positive changes in his thoughts, feelings and actions, leading to that which is better and positively progressive. Prophecies always rest upon specific causes; these again result in certain effects, whereby these effects can be changed at any time if only the preceding causes are changed in their form. Therefore, it is possible that negative or evil prophecies do not have to be fulfilled if the preceding causes will be purposely changed in a manner that positivity and good develop instead of negativity and evil." 

The first thing that should be noted here is that prophecies, according to the ET Quetzal, are not fixed events but are changeable. That's quite convenient when you think about it. If the prophecy turns out to be correct you can credit the Meier case, if the prophecy turns out to be incorrect you can claim events have changed in the mean time. That's basically a win-win scenario that's being set up. 

Quetzal:

"I will do that in a moment, but I would like to explain before beginning that I am not authorised to give exact indication of years in an official manner."

Next remarkable item to point out (and I skipped the usual venomous insults directed at people who question Meier and his alleged 'spiritually evolved' contacts) is that the exact year of a prophecy is not provided. Convenient if you want to be deliberately vague so that your prophecy is open to multiple interpretations. What exactly is the goal here? It's certainly not being 100% accurate and convincing, Again, there's a set up of some sort. 

Quetzal;

"The point in time at which these prophecies will begin to be fulfilled will be when a Pope will no longer reside in Rome."

Now this is actually helpful. A strong and helpful indicator. When the Pope no longer resides in Rome the Henoch Prophecies will come in to effect.

Quetzal;

"The people will be completely powerless against all this and will live through 888 days of Hell on Earth, suffering hunger and plagues which will claim even more lives than the war itself."

Fire and Brimstone. Megadeath. The best that the technologically highly evolved Plejaren aliens that travel immense distances in the Galaxy can do is resort to religious Biblical fearporn. No aid in any form except that people should follow the teachings of Billy Meier. Is that the set up?

Quetzal; 

"As a result, America will experience enormous catastrophes which will reach proportions barely imaginable to people of Earth. The destruction of the WTC, i.e., the World Trade Center, by terrorists will only be the beginning."

Wait a minute. Didn't the Henoch Prophecies come in to effect when a Pope no longer resides in Rome? As of this writing, November 2019, the Pope is still there. The terrorist attack on the World Trade Centers happened in September, 2001. The ET know-it-alls have their chronology in the wrong order. And since then no large terrorist attacks of the same caliber have taken place in the United States.

Next follows a highly unlikely WW3 scenario with France and Spain getting in armed conflict. Relations between those countries are fine right now. Civil war in France, Sweden and Russia. Again not remotely plausible in 2019. Massive civil unrest in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. With exception of the latter which has seen conflict for decades it is possible although today things are relatively peaceful. England and Wales show no signs of conflict. Right extremism is somewhat on the rise but far more in the US than in Europe. Russia - China war? No.

And it goes on. Russia attacks Scandinavia. Highly unlikely and Norway is a NATO member which means NATO would get involved. Russia attacks Turkey and Iran. Again highly unlikely. Iran is an ally of Russia and the Russians even operate an airbase there. Currently Iran depends on Russian trade and support because of sanctions imposed on that country by the US and Europe. NATO member Turkey has a large army. Russia would think twice before attacking and as of November 2019 relations are relatively good with Turkey buying the Russian S-400 missile system. Turkey is also a NATO member, if one member is attacked the rest will come to their aid. Civil wars in the US. Not likely as of now. I have noticed American culture is diverse and there's an anti-government sentiment among the people in more conservative states but the powers that be, the military-Industrial complex, would never let their country fall apart because of their (elite/financial) interests. 

So, what do the Henoch Prophecies amount up to? It becomes more clear in the addendum, what the Plejarens wish for Earth humans.

Quetzal;

19. The earth human must free himself from the variety of political, dictatorial, military, scientific and faith-oriented directions, as this alone guarantees, on the one hand, the discovery and following of the path of the Creational truth and its laws and commandments...

Ultimately prophecies are about religion. To scare you in to a religious directive so that you'll behave in a civilized manner and reject the urges of a violent, emotional, greedy half human half monkey type of being. This is what the Billy Meier case is all about. Religion. Yet the thing is, we humans don't handle religion that well. In the last few millenia there have been many conflicts, persecution and wars revolving around religion. Clearly being religious is not efficient enough. We humans often display a severe shortcoming with religion. Intolerance towards other religions… Quite often people think their religion is the only correct one, other religions are false. And there starts the conflict.

The Billy Meier case completely misses this point and in fact does the age old fallacy. My religion (Creation) is the right and only one, all others are false. The perfect recipe for future conflicts. 

Billy Meier, The God Of Megalomania

Once you really start digging deep in the Meier case you'll find some real "gems." Billy Meier not only claims to be a contactee but also makes some startling claims in the religious and reincarnation departments. He claims to be not just a prophet as well but to be THE prophet. Yes, Meier who lives on a farm in a rural area of Switzerland with his followers is the prophet of the New Age. Not just the New Age but Every Age once you start digging.

Meier claims reincarnation is real and that the spirit form gets born into a new body again after a while resting in the beyond. His spirit form has actually a name, Nokodemion. (Oddly enough the rest of us seemingly don't have one.) Nokodemion housed in many human bodies throughout history. You'll be surprised. They even made a chart. Meier, the "prophet," was also Jesus Christ (the Meier cult calls him Jmmanuel), prophet Mohammed and basically every Biblical prophet.

Meier claims to have introduced a religion throughout history with his previous incarnations which he calls Creation but that message got lost or distorted every time. Good news though, Meier also claims to have found the Original Bible in Israel but unfortunately it got lost. Translations were made however. Now you can get the intended one, it's only $65. You just have to take Meier's word for it..

Next to the religious incarnations are also some noteworthy Nokodemion's greatest achievements. Philosophers Aristotle and Socrates. Yes. Johan Faust, Galileo Galilei. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Jakob Mendelssohn Bartholdy and Grigori Rasputin. Oddly enough not many female body incarnations.

Now, a slight recap is in order. Do I believe Meier's claims? No. These claims are outrageous. There's no historical evidence for Meier's religious claims. Ancient documents such as the Dead Sea Scrolls or early copies of the Bible or Koran make no mention whatsoever of Meier's concept of Creation but that doesn't stop seemingly high priests of the Meier cult trying to make a case where there is none.

What's more likely here? Quite frankly, Billy Meier is a megalomaniac. And a seemingly shameless one at that. In psychology this is officially called Narcissistic Personality Disorder. If you have knowledge of the Meier case see if this fits Meier's personality;

 "Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder characterized by a long-term pattern of exaggerated feelings of self-importance, an excessive need for admiration, and a lack of empathy toward other people. People with NPD often spend much time thinking about achieving power and success, or on their appearance. Typically, they also take advantage of the people around them. Such narcissistic behavior typically begins by early adulthood, and occurs across a broad range of situations."

Even Meier's ex-wife basically comes to the same conclusion. ("Sex, money and power are his motives.")  This also explains why Billy Meier, a UFO contactee, relentlessly slanders and attacks other contactees or figures in ufology. His personality can't allow any competition. He has to uplift himself by denigrating others. His behavior is consistent with his NPD. No other person on Earth is as "spiritually" advanced as him, no other person has the truth. If you think I'm jumping to conclusions here, stay seated. It gets even worse. Billy Meier contact report 238, part 10;

"...But now the question remains open, where did, for example, Nokodemion come from, who not only established and engendered new peoples, rather he also created new peoples, who he then equipped with an advanced knowledge. It is generally indeed known that Nokodemion knows an age of 86,000,000,000 years and his oldest created people 29,500,000,000 years…."

Did you get that? Meier's spirit form also created people, human beings. Do you see how far the delusions of grandeur go? Not only is he at the center of religion or spirituality with his claims of having been Jesus Christ and Mohammed and the only self acclaimed source to extraterrestrials, he is also… God. He created people! Do you understand now how far his megalomania goes? When Meier is talking about the UFO religion Creation, it is His creation. Get it?

Here's………. Billy...

Michael Horn, How Does It Compare To The Adamski Case?

I knew this for some time already but last week while reading an interview I was again reminded of a very interesting fact regarding the Adamski case. The interview itself was with Glen Steckling, head of the George Adamski Foundation (GAF). In the interview he replies indepth to some questions;

Q: Where are the Adamski's original negative photos today?

A: Locked up in our vault and archives

Q: Have the negative been investigated by experts after Adamski's death?

A: All those who have examined the photos and negatives have never questioned their integrity. As you know, Sherwood did so with Kodak as well ... The principle for telescopic photography is very simple, and with 1950s and 60s technology, the graying effect of telescopic photos cannot be faked. AND of course, the motion picture footage remains some of the best and most authentic in civilian hands ...... If you look on our website you will find a copy of the Affidavit from the photo developer who examined and printed the original negatives. http://adamskifoundation.com/html/AboutGA.htm

Isn't that fascinating? George Adamski's original negatives are locked up in a vault! In 2014 the GAF released a previously unseen Adamski film (from 13:18 till 13:36). It kind of makes you wonder what else is still locked up in the vault. The new Adamski footage is quite remarkable and adding to the intrique I believe I've seen the same craft myself back in the 1990s. I would love to see this particular footage re-examined by todays (computer) equipment since I'm fairly confident it will produce positive results.

Now, lets hop over to the Meier case. If I'm not mistaken no Billy Meier photo negative remains while he did claim he took over 1500 pictures. No original film remains. Meier sold them or they got lost or they got stolen. Michael Horn even admits this in one of his blog posts;

"Their skeptical cry for access to now long gone negatives, etc., has been used to try to cast doubt on the evidence, as well as the honesty and character of Meier and all concerned."

Within the Meier information itself it is admitted that many original negatives were destroyed. The unsubstantiated excuse that is forwarded by Billy Meier and his alleged alien contacts is that the Men In Black were responsible for obvious fake photographs that emerged in order to discredit the former. Just like in Michael Horn's comment attention is diverted away that Meier could just as easily be the culprit himself.

"These people have obviously also brought falsified dinosaur pictures into circulation, in order to harm “Billy” and to make him uncredible. Interestingly enough, despite the destruction of the original photos by Quetzal, that falsified photo, along with other falsifications, suddenly emerged…."

Clearly we find ourselves in an interesting situation. Billy Meier who attacked and slandered other contactees since starting the contact reports with his alleged "highly evolved" alien contacts has no original photographs and films left. Which is ultimately ironic since he held no reservations criticizing other figures in ufology for their shortcomings. Meier, apparently shamelessly, even comes up with ridiculous debunking attempts when claiming eyewitnesses in the Adamski case were under some kind of hypnosis - making them see things that weren't there.
In 2002 I took this up with the authorised U.S. Billy Meier representative Michael Horn and since then he hasn't been able to sum up the intellectual courage that his megalomaniac cult leader is making unsubstantiated false claims. Back in 2002 all Horn could muster was; "How does it (the Adamski case) compare to the Meier case?
Well Mr Horn, Adamski's house is in order so to speak. Original negatives and films remain, are locked up in a vault and are ready for re-examination. Where are Billy Meier's photo negatives and original films? Gone right? So now it's 2019 and the ultimate question for you arises in my and everyone's mind; "How does it (the Meier case) compare to the Adamski case?

Adamski Witness List - For Michael Horn & Billy Meier

Lucy McGinnis, Alice K. Wells, George Hunt Williamson, Betty Williamson, Betty Bailey, Alfred Bailey witnessed the desert encounter and signed affidavits. Lucy McGinnis was interviewed in 1979 years after Adamski's passing and had this to say;

"Here came this great big ship that looked like a dirigible. And George said, quick, get me up there. I want to go and set up the telescope. So I drove him and Al Bailey up to where he said we should go. I kept looking out of the car and that ship turned and just followed us. And he said, here stop! So I stopped, and he got out, and that dirigible stopped - quite a ways away. I couldn't very well judge how far away it was. And he set up the telescope. And after he got everything set up, he said, Now you go back. My attention was attracted by a flash in the sky and almost instantly a beautifull small craft appeared to be drifting through a saddle between two of the mountain peaks and settling silently into one of the coves about half a mile from me. It did not lower itself entirely below the crest, while the upper, or dome section, remained above the crest and in full sight of the rest of my party who were back there watching. Yet it was in such a position that I could see the entire ship. You couldn't see very much detail that far away, they were far away enough to look like fenceposts. But they stood talking to each other, and we saw them turn and go back to the ship. Now I didn't see (Orthon) get into the ship. And when it left, it was just like a bubble or kind of like bright light that lifted up. Then George went out on the highway and he motioned for us to come out. He told us that he got too close and his arm had caught in the radiation from the craft. And he suffered from that quite for a while. . . You could see where the two of them had walked on the ground. There's no question about that at all."

Alice K. Wells was interviewed by Bill Hamilton and he had this to say;

"I met Adamski and stayed the weekend at Palomar Gardens in 1969. Years later I interviewed Alice Wells for about 4 hours. She was very sincere and vouched for all that was written in that first book and described the mother ship to me in some detail. She told me about an orange oval symbol on the side of the mother ship and how jets came in and it moved on. She declared that she could see "Orthon" clearly through the binoculars. She also recited the story of another visitor that appeared in the little restaurant at Palomar Gardens one day and answered all the questions about what it was like to travel in space."

Alan Tollman, a retired aerospace engineer, claims to have witnessed events on the Palomar Gardens property. Here's his affidavit in his own words;

" In 1956, I was visiting George Adamski. One night, he let me use his telescope and while looking through the scope, I saw a bluish streak that filled the field of view. I quickly looked up but saw nothing. Suddenly, I saw a blue white glow, elliptical in shape just beyond the grove of trees. George was talking to friends in his house. I walked toward the craft and as I got closer, could hear the soft, pleasing "humming" sound. At about 100 yards from the craft, I heard people from the restaurant down hill from George's house yelling loudly, " there is a UFO on the ground." From the restaurant, the people had an unobstructed view of the craft. Suddenly, a man from the restaurant almost knocked me down, saying " there is a UFO out there" and then disappeared. The craft increased in brightness, going from blue white to intense white that seemed to shimmer. The hum sound increased in frequency, until I could not hear it anymore. The craft shot straight up making no noise, into the stars, until it looked just like a star. It then shot off horizontally to the horizon. I went in to George's house and told him what had happened. He said he heard all the ruckus outside, and then just looked at me and smiled."

Laura Mundo, a hired promoter for Adamski, had this to say;

"Despite that I went on to promote his (Adamski's) out-of-town lectures for several years and in time I had my own proof beyond my intuition, of his authenticity. The same type of bell-like saucer he had photographed over his home in California came over my home in Dearborn, Michigan, later in 1954."

Madeline Rodeffer, who became friends with Adamski much later on in time, had this to remark about the footage taken in Silver Spring, 1965;

(Also note the eyewitness testimony by Ingrid Steckling.)

Major Hans C. Petersen of the Danish Air Force and his son Lars witnessed a flying saucer after Adamski's plane landed;

Author and researcher Bill Hamilton in his book Alien Magic, chapter 1;

"Later, I drove Ray and Rex from Giant Rock to Mount Palomar to visit the famous George Adamski. Ray and Adamski argued about the function of the Master Craft. Adamski had taken us back to a small workshop where he was doing some experiments with magnets. Although Ray claims that Adamski virtually admitted that he had no need of contacts to describe what he had written in his books, I received no such impression from the man. Later, I interviewed witnesses to Adamski's contacts who described details of incidents without hesitation. Many others had described seeing the scout ships at close range. In 1957, I had seen an orange-glowing craft one night that had the same bell-shaped configuration as the one Adamski photographed. If Adamski had been constructing small models of this craft, then the large-sized original was making its appearance known in various parts of the world."

Desmond Leslie;

 “I noticed a very bright ball of light rising rapidly from Adamski’s roof, about a quarter of a mile away. It rose rapidly, rather like a silvery-gold Verey Light, and continued to rise until it disappeared from sight. It gave the impression of accelerating as it rose. But the following evening I was to see it at very close range. We were sitting on the patio in the twilight, George, Alice Wells, Lucy McGinnis, and I with my back turned facing the doorway. A curious cold feeling came over me as of being watched, as if someone or something was standing directly behind me. I swung round in time to see a small golden disk between us and the Live Oaks fifty feet away. Almost instantly it shot up in the air with an imperceptible swish leaving a faint trail behind it, then vanished.

George grinned solemnly. ‘I was wondering when you were going to notice that!’ I was amazed. ‘One of those remote control things?’ I believe I asked. He nodded. ‘Well,’ I said, ‘thank God our conversation’s been reasonably clean for the last half hour,’ and we all laughed. For George enjoyed a good story and was quite unshockable. I felt rather smug, like a schoolboy who for once has been behaving himself when the Headmaster appears silently in the dormitory.” 

Ken Pearson and Henk Hinfelaar in New Zealand;

One day traveling by car between two engagements, Adamski and his two kiwi companions were accompanied on part of their rural journey by five pinpoints of light high in the sky which left vapour trails. The five trails “seemed to keep pace with us,” Ken Pearson wrote later, “connecting the various clouds on the way.” The driver of the car, Henk Hinfelaar, said that Adamski accepted the aerial ‘escort’ as a natural thing; he looked at the trails and said casually, “Oh yeah, dat’ll be de boys.” A check later with air traffic control indicated no known air traffic in the vicinity at that time.

Two nights later after an Adamski lecture in a small town, the wife of one of the men who had been in the car watched a disc manoeuvre above the lecture hall. This was small potatoes compared with a sighting a few days later that two other Adamski escorts had in the town of Taupo. After passing George on to a new set of hosts taking him further on his tour, Bill and Isobel Miller lay on their backs in a lake-side park watching “dozens” of saucers zipping around high in the sky. Bill Miller qualified his bold claim to a local newspaper – “We could have seen the same ones twice.”

Fred Steckling;

“I can’t even tell you how many scout craft or spacecraft we have seen…because I don’t think anybody would believe it.”


Jusr a few secondary witnesses.

Navy pilot commander Graham Bethune;

Hugo Vega;

'I never thought I would see a flying saucer, much less photograph one,' said Lima architect Hugo Luyo Vega, following the sighting of an unknown flying machine, identical to George Adamski's 'scoutcraft', which Vega photographed on 19 October 1973. On the day in question, Vega had taken a client into the Lima countryside in search of a home site. They had driven about 54 miles inland along the Rimac River when they took a break near a valley surrounded by tall hills. Suddenly, Vega told reporters, 'my client, obviously exicted, told me he saw a shining object in the bottom of the valley that was advancing towards us extremely slowly.'

"The car was not far away. I ran back for my camera, because in that fraction of a second I thought I, too, had seen something interesting. When I pointed my [Polaroid] camera and took the picture, the object was less than 50 yards away from us and about 20 yards off the ground. Suddenly, the object changed direction, headed toward the east and increased its speed. It rose off the ground as if trying to avoid some high-tension wires that came down from the top of one of the hills and crossed the valley, and disappeared from view. It was of the colour of burnished silver [and] shaped like an overturned soup plate with a cupola on top. At the very top of the cupola, there was a round object giving off a fixed, sky-blue light. Lower on the cupola, we could see a row of small windows like port-holes in a ship."

On the bottom of the craft was what appeared to be 'the propulsive force of the object. . . a dark red throbbing light that was aimed toward the ground from a sort of turbine in the middle of the upside-down plate. Near the turbine-like part, we could see protuberances like half-eggs.' The architect said that only about 30 seconds from the time they spotted the object until it disappeared. 'For a moment I didn't actually think the picture would come out all right, for I don't consider myself all that good a photographer, and I was greatly surprised when I saw that it had come out,' Vega continued. 'All the photo showed was the thing's shape, but at any rate this little piece of evidence is enough to prove that it was a real "UFO" and not an invention of the mind.' It took the witnesses some 20 minutes to recover from their astonishment. Vega was reluctant to disclose the identity of his client. 'He is a wealthy man who prefers no publicity,' he explained."

Brad Mildern;

My first sighting took place in Stawell, Victoria Australia, in about 1958. (Boy, how does anyone remember back that far.) I was around eleven years of age and it was probably spring or summer of that year as it was a fine cloudless day. Not usual at all, in the other months of the year. I remember the occurrence vividly. It was 11:30 AM and I was about to leave the house by the front door. This door faces due west and if not for the house across the street it would have been possible to see the Grampians Mountains around 20 Km away. As I left the house, I noticed a gleaming silver object the size of a dot at an elevation of 15 to 20 degrees dead ahead of me. It was later estimated by all witnesses to be around 10 Km distant which would mean its height would have been around 1,500 to 2,000 feet. It was giving off a series of repeated bright lights from underneath, Blue, Red, Green, White, in that order. I couldn't see what the “dot” was, but it was hovering in the one spot without moving. I watched it for a few minutes and then called my parents who came and saw the same thing as I did. After a while we called the neighbors from across the street, who brought over their tripod mounted telescope. It was only a 4 inch 'scope but it brought the object into clear and undisputed view. It was a classic early 1950s flying saucer.
A flat bottomed disc with a turret type dome on top with windows and the old 3 ball type undercarriage protrusions beneath it. The flashing lights were coming from a point directly under the middle of the disc. I had seen pictures of the original flying saucers, which by that time, had been resoundingly debunked by officialdom and ridiculed by the press so I was not a stranger to what it was. Nor were my parents and my neighbors. There was one difference I noted from the pictures though. Where the old pictures showed round porthole type windows, this craft had vertically elongated rectangular windows with rounded tops. Just like the narrow church windows you sometimes see. All of us watched that disc hovering there without movement or change until after 1 PM, almost 2 hours. Having other things to do, we gradually broke up and went away and the next time I looked for it, it was gone. With multiple witnesses watching this UFO in daylight for such a long period through a telescope, I conclude that there is no doubt it was an alien constructed flying machine. What its reasons for being there and all the other question as to where it came from, etc., remain unknown, but one thing is for sure…. It shaped my belief in the phenomenon for the rest of my life 

Lastly, 3 police officers;

On a January night in 1978 Sergeant Tony Dodd and Police Constable Alan Dale were driving in the vicinity of Cononley, near Skipton, Yorkshire, in their official line of duty, when a strange aerial machine came into view. 'We were going down a country lane,' Sergeant Dodd explained, 'and you know what it's like up there - it was dark - and the only light you've got is your headlights. Suddenly the road in front of us lit up. Of course, the immediate reaction is, where's the light coming from? But it was coming from above. We stopped the car, looked up, and there was this thing coming from our right to our left.' The object was about 100 feet away, moving at less than 40 mph.' It was glowing; like a bright white incandescent glow, and it came right over our heads,' the police sergeant recalled.' The whole unit was glowing. It was as if the metal of what this thing was made of was white hot. And there were these three great spheres underneath, like huge ball-bearings - three of them equally placed around it. There was a hollow area underneath and like a skirting around the bottom, but these things protruded below that.' It was absolutely awe-inspiring to see it. I don't know how to explain it to you - it was such a beautiful-looking thing. It seemed to have portholes round the dome - an elongated domed area. And what stood out more than anything else was the coloured lights dancing round on the outside of the skirt at the bottom. . . which gave the visual impression that it was rotating. Now whether the thing was going round, or whether it was just the lights that were going round and give that impression, I don't know.I would say it was the lights that were going round because, when you were looking at the portholes, they didn't seem to be going round in a circle as you would have expected.' The object was completely soundless. 'When the thing had passed over our heads it sort of went into the distance then suddenly appeared to come down: there's a big wood to our left, right on a distant hillside, and it appeared to go down in that wood,' said Sergeant Dodd, who added that a third police officer had seen the object. 'We carried on along this road and as we got towards the village we could see these lights coming towards us from the other direction - it was another police car. We stopped, and he said, "I've just been watching this damn great UFO, and it seems to have come right down somewhere over here! 


Well, I had to stop here because there are many more witnesses, enough to fill a book. And mind you, all of this is prior to the information age of the internet. God knows how many eyewitness testimonies got lost over time.

Now, I asked Billy Meier in 2002 (via his website) why he regarded George Adamski as a fraud while the latter did have eyewitnesses to support some of his claims. The response was that Adamski had used the power of suggestion, some sort of hypnosis, letting the eyewitnesses see "things" that weren't there. I thought Meier's explanation was false and dishonest to say the least. As some eyewitnesses point out, they had sightings when Adamski wasn't even present and in the presence of other people. How could Adamski have "hypnotized" them if he even wasn't there?

I have taken this up with Michael Horn, the U.S. authorized Billy Meier representative, even as far back as 2002. Yet until this day he doesn't have the intellectual courage to accept even one eyewitness testimony in the Adamski case. Which is strange and hypocritical because he has no reservations pointing out Billy Meier had eyewitnesses to support some of his claims. Clearly, the unsubstantiated, outrageous claim by Billy Meier (who has everything to gain by discrediting other contactees) holds more value in his mind than the sworn testimony of dozens of honest and genuine people.

Mr Meier, Mr Horn! It's not to late to save some dignity. Retract your claims regarding Adamski.

Michael Horn: New Age Fascist?

A couple of days ago I had some time on my hands and strolled over to Michael Horn's website theyfly.com. One article in particular caught my attention and Horn goes off in a tantrum against Exopolitics and Michael Salla (among others). Now I realise that the Exopolitics field is by no means perfect and is made up by diverse characters who have their own take on the field, and personally I disagree with some of their conclusions but the general essence of the movement is based on democratic principles. Everyone can have their say. Exopolitics, right or wrong, uses a wide range of sources to make their case. Of course there is some internal disagreement about those sources but that is mostly set aside for the greater good - informing the public about UFOs, their possible ramifications and creating a political movement.

Michael Horn however seems to have such a low, and in my view, unfair opinion about Exopolitics that I felt the need to respond here. For those that don't know him, Michael Horn is the U.S. representative and spokesperson for the Billy Meier case. The more experienced internet surfers stand a good chance having met Mikey on forums (regarding UFOs) or ran across some of his articles since the guy doesn't shy away from any media attention. Aside from the fact that he sells Meier products, and I wont set my sights on that, the guy seems to truly believe every bit of information the Meier case forwards. In that lies his Achilles heel and from my perspective also shows his position in the ufological 'political spectrum'.

Lets take a look at some of the things Mr Horn writes;

And what is the last refuge of scoundrels who can’t find it in government or academia? Well, it’s the new safe harbor of “exopolitics”, the latest self-serving, cobbled together alliance of wishful thinkers, fantasists and conmen who share a common interest in, and an even more enormous lack of knowledge about, UFOs.

Is it my imagination or are people lumped together and dismissed with extreme prejudice? Michael Horn's 'charming' personality radiates through this excerpt, and it is the same Michael most people came to know on forums. What Mikey also points out in his article is that a number of Exopoliticians don't seem willing to collaborate with him. There are some perfectly good reasons for that. First, you can see what kind of person he is just by reading the excerpt above. He's rude, vicious, demanding and wants to be an authority. Secondly, most Exopoliticians came to the realisation that the Meier material is egocentric. It's exclusively based on Meier, his findings and conclusions, and no one elses. In fact other sources are dismissed. So why would Exopoliticians promote a case that wont promote them or their findings? There lies the catch, which Horn neglects to mention.

Let’s also give a dishonorable mention to Alfred Webre, who, along with Salla and Bassett, unashamedly promotes the completely unsubstantiated (to say nothing of illogical and moronic) notion that there are “benevolent extraterrestrials walking among us”. That’s right, ETs are strolling around everywhere, presumably taking a vacation from eons of boring, peaceful existence and traveling in space (and perhaps even time) in order to enjoy our overpopulated, polluted, warlike, greedy, self-destructive world, which is obviously amply populated by fools and idiots, with too much time on their hands, who invent such scenarios.

The "extraterrestrials walking among us", which is so easily dismissed by Horn, has its origins in other contactee material but also from individuals who experimented and experienced strange matters. There are literally dozens, if not hundreds of accounts where people claimed to have met ETs (or where they thought they were ETs). When you're an objective investigator it's not so easy to arbitrarily dismiss this aspect of Ufology, yet Michael Horn manages that with great ease. But here comes the real kicker.
Eventhough Horn denies that ETs could walk among us, in the Meier case the exact same thing is reported and there Horn accepts and supports the notion. Billy Meier's human looking ET contacts apparently are real enough, although practically no one has seen them besides Meier. Now isn't that a classic example of hypocrisy? And Michael Horn wonders why hardly anyone wants to collaborate with him? Maybe he doesn't realise that the approach he is taking is one of conflict and double standards, but I doubt that.

Why else do we perpetually encounter people and tactics designed to divert us from finding and seeing the complete, real truth about UFOs? The truth about UFOs and extraterrestrials absolutely should be known but you won’t find it with exopolitics, or its very self-serving “leaders”.

The text above comes very close in showing Horn's real agenda, he just needs to explain what the "real truth about UFOs" is. I can tell you that. The real truth about UFOs. . . can be found in the Meier case, according to Horn. That's what it boils down to. And there are no other sources because Billy Meier and his ET friends said so. That is what Horn is constantly working on, promoting the Meier case and presenting it as the only genuine source for UFO and extraterrestrial related information. Exopolitics, by its very nature, uses many sources, so there's an inherent incompatibility which Michael Horn neglects to expand upon. Meier's word is the gospel for Horn. Exopolitics are an obstacle (when they don't help his cause).
If I had to put Horn's methodology in a political spectrum it would be the far right. His views are radical, authoritarian, uncompromising and rely on a single (questionable) source. Decide for yourself then if Michael Horn is a delusional con man, a New Age Fascist, or maybe. . . both.

P.S.
(In the last sentence above I employed a tactic from Michael Horn's article, giving the reader a choice between two negatives. Nice try Mikey.)