One of the first things that caught my attention while researching the Meier case was the treatment of other “contactees” in the contact reports. Having researched a number of contactee cases I realized that some are supported by photographs, films and eyewitness testimonies. I’m not claiming every aspect is true but for some elements in the contactee phenomenon there’s actually some supporting evidence and worth investigating. The highly unusual aspect of the Meier case is that it tries to debunk and discredit those other Contactees at an alarming rate. Practically every high profile case gets dismissed or distorted by Meier, leaving his own information as the sole and correct source of alleged UFO&ET matters. After much contemplation I’ve come to the conclusion that Meier does this deliberately. It’s simply part of his agenda if you will. He can’t tolerate any competition. But lets go to Meier’s contact reports.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_1
Semjase’s Explanations
1. For some time now we have had the urge to contact a human being on Earth who sincerely and concretely wants to help us in our mission.
2. We have often tried to do this before, but the selected human beings were neither knowledgeable nor willing enough, and often lacked sincerity and loyalty as well.
3. But those we could have selected for our endeavours were afraid and remained silent about our coming.
4. They insisted they would be accused of being insane and of lying, and that attempts to harm them might be made through official and foolish human intrigues.
5. Instead, many boastful individuals have appeared who claim to have contact with us and even to have flown in our beamships.
6. But they are nothing but charlatans and frauds who sun themselves in dubious glory and want to profit from it.
Semjase’s Explanations
1. For some time now we have had the urge to contact a human being on Earth who sincerely and concretely wants to help us in our mission.
2. We have often tried to do this before, but the selected human beings were neither knowledgeable nor willing enough, and often lacked sincerity and loyalty as well.
3. But those we could have selected for our endeavours were afraid and remained silent about our coming.
4. They insisted they would be accused of being insane and of lying, and that attempts to harm them might be made through official and foolish human intrigues.
5. Instead, many boastful individuals have appeared who claim to have contact with us and even to have flown in our beamships.
6. But they are nothing but charlatans and frauds who sun themselves in dubious glory and want to profit from it.
So, here we have the first contact report and after a brief introduction Semjase immediately aims her sight at ‘the other contactees!’ Hardly a coincedence considering this is the first offical publication of an alleged contact between an Earth man and alien woman. The world’s problems aren’t discussed. No, alleged false ET contacts and the belief system of Meier and the Pleiadians/Plejarens are the first two things forwarded! Lets go to the second contact note.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_2
Billy
Well, okay, now please tell me one thing: You already have spoken several times of frauds and charlatans who have gone public with their fantastic UFO contact tales, and continue to do so. Can you give me some names?
Semjase
57. Absolutely, but you know most of them by name.
Billy
Nevertheless, please give me at least a few.
Semjase
58. As you wish—with whom should I begin?
Billy
First of all, I would be interested to know about Kenneth Arnold. Am I correct that he was not a fraud?
Semjase
59. Certainly, this man was no fraud, for he really had seen our beamships.
60. Many other pilots have encountered our beamships or alien ones as well.
61. The greatest fraud, however, was the man who called himself Karl Michalek.
62. And on the same level was the man who became world-famous by the name of George Adamski.
63. His so-called colleagues or friends belong in the same category also.
64. This means those around him who pretended having had contact with us.
65. Other names are lesser known, but are of a certain importance because they are frauds: Harushi Tsukamoto, Jerrold Baker, R. O. Schmidt, C. A. Anderson, Angelucci, and many, many more.
Billy
Well, okay, now please tell me one thing: You already have spoken several times of frauds and charlatans who have gone public with their fantastic UFO contact tales, and continue to do so. Can you give me some names?
Semjase
57. Absolutely, but you know most of them by name.
Billy
Nevertheless, please give me at least a few.
Semjase
58. As you wish—with whom should I begin?
Billy
First of all, I would be interested to know about Kenneth Arnold. Am I correct that he was not a fraud?
Semjase
59. Certainly, this man was no fraud, for he really had seen our beamships.
60. Many other pilots have encountered our beamships or alien ones as well.
61. The greatest fraud, however, was the man who called himself Karl Michalek.
62. And on the same level was the man who became world-famous by the name of George Adamski.
63. His so-called colleagues or friends belong in the same category also.
64. This means those around him who pretended having had contact with us.
65. Other names are lesser known, but are of a certain importance because they are frauds: Harushi Tsukamoto, Jerrold Baker, R. O. Schmidt, C. A. Anderson, Angelucci, and many, many more.
After some ego-boosting and flattery comments towards Meier the discredit campaign goes into full swing and people are named. The second alleged offcial ET communication and again humanities problems aren’t discussed, no it’s those pesky other contactees who seemingly ruin everything. Lets view some other contact reports.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_39
Billy:
It’s alright, Semjase, it’s actually also our fault; we sometimes just don’t think far enough. It probably would have been better if I had tried to get all names of UFO contactees, in order, then, to ask you about the genuineness of the names. In particular, you did, indeed, tell me that Adamski was not a contactee, as well as not Michalek or the South African, Elizabeth Klarer. But recently, I’ve heard of another name, a certain Menkger or Menger or something like that. What about this one?
Semjase:
150. Menger – he is not a contactee.
151. His statements and remarks correspond to a deliberate product of his imagination.
Billy:
It’s alright, Semjase, it’s actually also our fault; we sometimes just don’t think far enough. It probably would have been better if I had tried to get all names of UFO contactees, in order, then, to ask you about the genuineness of the names. In particular, you did, indeed, tell me that Adamski was not a contactee, as well as not Michalek or the South African, Elizabeth Klarer. But recently, I’ve heard of another name, a certain Menkger or Menger or something like that. What about this one?
Semjase:
150. Menger – he is not a contactee.
151. His statements and remarks correspond to a deliberate product of his imagination.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_249
Billy:
What is behind this: Quetzal and Semjase explained to me once that Dan Fry, an American, actually did have contact with extraterrestrials. He is said to have taken photos as well, but he later destroyed them; somebody made forgeries of them and attributed them to Fry. This is supposed to be the reason why none of Dan Fry’s real photos of alien flying objects exist any longer. Even the story about the origin of the extraterrestrials and their accounts was apparently thoroughly distorted. This is what Quetzal told me, but it never appeared in any contact report.
Ptaah:
That is exactly what happened.
Billy:
What is behind this: Quetzal and Semjase explained to me once that Dan Fry, an American, actually did have contact with extraterrestrials. He is said to have taken photos as well, but he later destroyed them; somebody made forgeries of them and attributed them to Fry. This is supposed to be the reason why none of Dan Fry’s real photos of alien flying objects exist any longer. Even the story about the origin of the extraterrestrials and their accounts was apparently thoroughly distorted. This is what Quetzal told me, but it never appeared in any contact report.
Ptaah:
That is exactly what happened.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251
Billy:
Naturally. – But I still have a question: Is it not possible that some things you just mentioned may be responsible for claims made by Ed Walters in America, who also offers photos?
Ptaah:
He is a swindler and a fraud, and his photos are counterfeit. This is an established fact.
Billy:
Naturally. – But I still have a question: Is it not possible that some things you just mentioned may be responsible for claims made by Ed Walters in America, who also offers photos?
Ptaah:
He is a swindler and a fraud, and his photos are counterfeit. This is an established fact.
Billy:
Thank you. Another question: For his book Geheimsache UFO … (Secret Matter UFO …), Michael Hesemann used a cover photo, taken by a certain Amaury Rivera, that shows an American Air Force F-14 interceptor and a UFO over Puerto Rico. Do you know anything about this?
Ptaah:
Certainly. There is no doubt that trick photography was used with models suspended with fishing lines. We checked into this matter as thoroughly as we did with Ed Walters, whose photos also utilized trick photography. Michael Hesemann is an enthusiastic ufologist but he is, in this respect extremely, almost irresponsibly, gullible. He allows himself to be unusually easily tricked and deceived, and he erroneously believes that he is of extraterrestrial origin. As our very profound investigations have shown, he is a purely Earth-created individual and this may, in part, be the reason for his UFO enthusiasm and the fact that he is so easily deceived.
Thank you. Another question: For his book Geheimsache UFO … (Secret Matter UFO …), Michael Hesemann used a cover photo, taken by a certain Amaury Rivera, that shows an American Air Force F-14 interceptor and a UFO over Puerto Rico. Do you know anything about this?
Ptaah:
Certainly. There is no doubt that trick photography was used with models suspended with fishing lines. We checked into this matter as thoroughly as we did with Ed Walters, whose photos also utilized trick photography. Michael Hesemann is an enthusiastic ufologist but he is, in this respect extremely, almost irresponsibly, gullible. He allows himself to be unusually easily tricked and deceived, and he erroneously believes that he is of extraterrestrial origin. As our very profound investigations have shown, he is a purely Earth-created individual and this may, in part, be the reason for his UFO enthusiasm and the fact that he is so easily deceived.
Billy:
Carlos Diaz, a purported contactee, what do you think of him?
Ptaah:
You pose an illogical question, for I already explained that no human beings on Earth maintain any contacts with extraterrestrial intelligences. Therefore he is a liar, fraud and cheat
Carlos Diaz, a purported contactee, what do you think of him?
Ptaah:
You pose an illogical question, for I already explained that no human beings on Earth maintain any contacts with extraterrestrial intelligences. Therefore he is a liar, fraud and cheat
As you can see the contact reports are full of dismissive comments directed at other alleged ET contact cases. The ultimate irony here is that Billy Meier is a debunker himself. He’s also quite knowledgable of other UFO/ET cases and it’s no secret he had an interest in the subject before he went public with his own stories. He was part of a UFO group and very telling is that Meier visited George Adamski while he lectured in Switzerland. For me the conclusion is simple; Meier attacks other contactees deliberately in order to bolster his own case.
No comments:
Post a Comment