November 1, 2019

Michael Horn, How Does It Compare To The Adamski Case?

I knew this for some time already but last week while reading an interview I was again reminded of a very interesting fact regarding the Adamski case. The interview itself was with Glen Steckling, head of the George Adamski Foundation (GAF). In the interview he replies indepth to some questions;

Q: Where are the Adamski's original negative photos today?

A: Locked up in our vault and archives

Q: Have the negative been investigated by experts after Adamski's death?

A: All those who have examined the photos and negatives have never questioned their integrity. As you know, Sherwood did so with Kodak as well ... The principle for telescopic photography is very simple, and with 1950s and 60s technology, the graying effect of telescopic photos cannot be faked. AND of course, the motion picture footage remains some of the best and most authentic in civilian hands ...... If you look on our website you will find a copy of the Affidavit from the photo developer who examined and printed the original negatives. http://adamskifoundation.com/html/AboutGA.htm

Isn't that fascinating? George Adamski's original negatives are locked up in a vault! In 2014 the GAF released a previously unseen Adamski film (from 13:18 till 13:36). It kind of makes you wonder what else is still locked up in the vault. The new Adamski footage is quite remarkable and adding to the intrique I believe I've seen the same craft myself back in the 1990s. I would love to see this particular footage re-examined by todays (computer) equipment since I'm fairly confident it will produce positive results.

Now, lets hop over to the Meier case. If I'm not mistaken no Billy Meier photo negative remains while he did claim he took over 1500 pictures. No original film remains. Meier sold them or they got lost or they got stolen. Michael Horn even admits this in one of his blog posts;

"Their skeptical cry for access to now long gone negatives, etc., has been used to try to cast doubt on the evidence, as well as the honesty and character of Meier and all concerned."

Within the Meier information itself it is admitted that many original negatives were destroyed. The unsubstantiated excuse that is forwarded by Billy Meier and his alleged alien contacts is that the Men In Black were responsible for obvious fake photographs that emerged in order to discredit the former. Just like in Michael Horn's comment attention is diverted away that Meier could just as easily be the culprit himself.

"These people have obviously also brought falsified dinosaur pictures into circulation, in order to harm “Billy” and to make him uncredible. Interestingly enough, despite the destruction of the original photos by Quetzal, that falsified photo, along with other falsifications, suddenly emerged…."

Clearly we find ourselves in an interesting situation. Billy Meier who attacked and slandered other contactees since starting the contact reports with his alleged "highly evolved" alien contacts has no original photographs and films left. Which is ultimately ironic since he held no reservations criticizing other figures in ufology for their shortcomings. Meier, apparently shamelessly, even comes up with ridiculous debunking attempts when claiming eyewitnesses in the Adamski case were under some kind of hypnosis - making them see things that weren't there.
In 2002 I took this up with the authorised U.S. Billy Meier representative Michael Horn and since then he hasn't been able to sum up the intellectual courage that his megalomaniac cult leader is making unsubstantiated false claims. Back in 2002 all Horn could muster was; "How does it (the Adamski case) compare to the Meier case?
Well Mr Horn, Adamski's house is in order so to speak. Original negatives and films remain, are locked up in a vault and are ready for re-examination. Where are Billy Meier's photo negatives and original films? Gone right? So now it's 2019 and the ultimate question for you arises in my and everyone's mind; "How does it (the Meier case) compare to the Adamski case?

No comments: