Billy Meier Explained

 

Psychopaths often already display troublesome behavior in their teens. Billy Meier was arrested and sent to youth prison at the age of 14 and again at the age of 16.

Best UFO Movies 2023

 

Lights In The Sky

 

Adamski Witness

 According to Billy Meier this man was "hypnotized" into seeing things that weren't there! By the way, the man in the video is Hans Petersen. Major of the Danish Air Force.

Billy Meier & How The Con Works

 

Above is a screenshot of a blog article by Michael Horn, Billy Meier's authorized U.S. spokesperson. It claims that Billy Meier foresaw the Turkey-Syria eartquakes of February 6. Actually, he didn't. When the news came out that day I checked the FIGU main website as well as Horn's blog. There was zero information on the devastating earthquakes. Nothing was "prophecized" or "predicted." But lo and behold a week orso later Meier's contact report 833 claims that Meier "predicted" the earthquakes. The date of the alleged report was given as February the 3rd. 3 days before the event!

This is how the con works. Simply backdate! Write a report after the event and claim the date of it was before the event. This is how Meier tries to establish his reputation as a "prophet" or an extraordinary human being with great foresight and spiritual powers. Below is a screenshot of when the 833th contact report of a giant database of Meier's contact stories was published. The last edit was February the 15th! Nothing before the actual event on the 6th. This is how frauds like Billy Meier and Michael Horn operate. Don't believe me? Next time after an important world event take screenshots of the aforementiond website(s) and you'll magically see how Billy Meier "prophesized" it (later on). He's a one-trick p(h)ony!

Just A Coincedence?

 Screenshot of a movie filmed by George Adamski.

Geesh, you think it's a coincedence? Or is it a synchronicity?

"The Keys"

 Article by Meiron Hughes.

"Amongst the plethora of UFO sighting and alien abduction stories, and of Grey Aliens, Hammerhead Aliens, Reptilians etc., there is one very common experience of contact that for years has been going largely unnoticed by the burgeoning UFO investigation and publishing industry. The vast majority of these contactees do not report or publicize their experience; the contacts are with beings who appear to look just like us; and thousands of these contacts could be taking place globally and unnoticed each year in mundane, public and seemingly ridiculous openness.  There is an indication that these aliens are perhaps living and working towards their own agenda, right in amongst us.

     So why are these thousands of contacts unreported? And how can we know that these "human-types"(sometimes referred to as "talls" or "nordics") are actually extraterrestrial?

     The answers are complex. Firstly, despite a profound effect that the experience has on the contactee, it appears to be a very personal, private and almost sacrosanct experience that the contactee feels instinctively should not be divulged. Secondly, the experiences generally occur in mundane and public locations such as hotel lobbies, airports, bus and rail stations and sometimes out in secluded country areas.

     There are common, identifiable denominators to these human / human-alien contacts: 1) The contact appears to be initiated somehow by the contactees themselves. 2) There is a telepathic element used by the alien to help the contactee confirm that it is an extraordinary event. 3) The physical appearance of these "visitors" at close quarters reveals that they are in fact very different to us in a number of subtle ways. 4) The experience has a profound and often "life changing" influence on the contactee - they have had confirmation that something which could not possibly be real is in fact true.

     The key elements, sometimes referred to as "the keys" by these contactees, are within those denominators, and are generally kept secret by the contactee.

     This "secrecy" obviously means it is difficult for any investigator to report this type of experience with any sense of meaning to a wider world. One of the causes of this attitude is that compared with the mass of dramatic contact and abduction stories circulating on the web and published en-mass in the UFO books, the contact incidents seem somehow mundane and even trivial. The contactee feels that although he or she has experienced a truly remarkable event - contact with an extraterrestrial life-form that looks just like us, and who are moving largely unnoticed amongst us - the experience will have no value to anyone else because the only way to prove it is to have experienced it. They decide that there is little point reporting the contact as nobody else will ever believe it. There is, however, a growing tendency by some of these contactees to give out clues and hints of these experiences that they know will only be recognized by others who have shared similar events.

     UFO investigators sometimes offer these clues in their books, and also, as in the case of Timothy Good, perhaps gives us an insight into why Tim Good, who was a leading musician with a Symphony Orchestra, suddenly abandoned that career to become a UFO investigator. In 1967 Good was in New York for a series of concerts with the London Symphony Orchestra. He already had an interest in the UFO phenomenon and had spoken to many witnesses during his travels around the world. A rare percentage of these witnesses had given him accounts of contact by human types in mundane surroundings, and the telepathic nature of the way in which the contact was "invited". A skeptical Tim Good decided to try an experiment during a moment of boredom while he was waiting in the lobby of the Park Sheraton Hotel. He describes "sending out a telepathic request" and how contact was made within minutes. He gives very few details and sums it up thus: "As far as I am concerned the experiment was a success. It is not the sort of experiment that would meet the approval of radio astronomers. I believe that it was intended as personal proof and encouragement for me, and, as such, was of no value to others." Good carefully avoids describing his contact and in his books gives an occasional clue about "protecting the keys". These two elements - the mundane almost casual account of the contact; the separate and seemingly unconnected references elsewhere to "protecting the keys" - are recognition signals for others who have had identical experiences.

     There was also a NASA scientist who made the mistake of revealing his experience to his employers. He was forced to flee the United States with his family and assumed a new identity in Europe. He was interviewed by BBC Radio in 1991 in a programme about which the interviewer and journalists at the BBC made evident during and after the interview that they considered this Scientist's story as reliable, remarkable and "earth shattering". They were perhaps disappointed that the interview never made it to the mainstream news and was only broadcast in the early hours of the morning.

     Then there is the case of author Mike Bloom, who had one of these experiences in 1992. He was then a trade union negotiator.  His contact occurred while he was waiting for a train after an important meeting in a British city. It had such a profound effect upon him, leaving him with a deep rooted sense that he "had a task to perform", that his career floundered. There were also follow-up experiences, which he describes as "downloads" of a "telepathic, but apparently "subliminal" nature. He also has a perhaps naive faith that the experiences arising from his contact are beneficial to him.

     The nearest he has come to revealing the details of his contact to a wider audience, is in a fictional book, "The Selected", in which he projects a mix of possible negative and positive consequences for humanity arising from what he knows.

     Just why Bloom chose to place his novels with such an obscure web-based publisher is beyond me, but apparently perfectly logical to him. The Selected, it is reported, has not been submitted to even one mainstream publisher. His publishers guard his real identity carefully and Bloom will only communicate by e-mail (a form of contact that I was able to establish via his publisher). He admits that the main character in The Selected goes through events that occurred in his real life and that he has scattered clues to "the keys" throughout his book. But he refuses to be specific about the keys, stating, "the experience was personal, and would be of no value to anyone else. Spelling out the "keys" might result in them being used by frauds and hoaxters. Others who have met the "other guys" will recognize my account if they read it, and there is a certain amount of carefully worded communication between contactees going on. I always welcome hearing from others and the big question in my mind is: "what, if anything, are we going to do in response to this knowledge?"

George Adamski Scoutship Type 2

 

(New) 1957 Mt Palomar George Adamski Photograph

 I made a screenshot of a 1957 previously unreleased George Adamski photograph by Glenn Steckling who shared it with professional photographer Rene Olsen who comments on it in this video. The big object has a translucent quality to it while there are also many smaller objects in the shot.

It kinda makes you wonder what else they have locked up in a vault.

Contactee Rene Olsen

 This video also contains new George Adamski evidence...

The Contactees - what it means to be a contactee - YouTube

Mt Palomar UFO Photo's

 The plot thickens. Mt Palomar is where George Adamski took many of his photographs. Source as of yet unknown. From Rene Olsen's website.

Billy Meier & The Art Of Polishing A Turd

 Once you get into the Billy Meier UFO case information it becomes apparent that he has an enormous hatred and jealousy of George Adamski. And he actually met the man in Switzerland while on lecture but somehow reached a highly negative judgement about George Adamski's character even though the latter was kind to him. Yet, as usual, there's more. Michael Horn was so kind to make a file. Here are a few excerpts to make my point.

Ptaah: 501. You know a guy named George Adamski, right? 

Billy: You know him, you have told me about him several times. I also know him personally from before, when he was at the Volkshaus in Zurich in May 1959. I did not get the best impression of him then, although I had to talk to him with an interpreter because I did not speak English at that time. I noticed, however, that the man was dominated by a tremendous stubbornness and by a great egoism that seemed unusual to me, but which was supposed to be covered up by an almost perfectly acted kindness and charity. I found that the man had an extraordinary gift for persuasion and suggestion and always knew how to take over the conversation. It was clear that he had fallen for an ideal and was exploiting it in his own favour with a feigned help for the oppressed. So also fighting injustice seemed to me to be only acted by him and everything only to put himself in the centre. It seemed to me that in the first and last place for him only his own needs were always predominant, and that from the big toe up to the last tip of his hair. I had the impression at the time that in every respect he was only ever concerned with his own ego and his own well-being, which he directed into the highest channels through a tremendous power of imagination and suggestion. He also seemed to me to be dominated by the will to want to be first in every relationship and also to want to take the lead in every relationship. 

Ptaah: 502. You have observed and analysed the man very carefully, which apparently no Earth human being has ever been able to do before. 

Wow, so only Meier and Ptaah are able to see it. What are the odds? Gets even worse.

Billy: … n the 57th Contact of the 23rd of June 1976 Semjase told me that within a year she would bring me an original document from George Adamski in which he had admitted that his UFO concerns were only fraud and charlatanry. Semjase actually brought me a document, but it was only a copy, which I also lost in a strange way. But I never received the original document. 

Ptaah: 94. That is correct. 

95. Adamski's document actually existed, but it was destroyed by the person who had it in custody because he/she did not want Adamski to be exposed posthumously as a fraud. 

96. So our people who were responsible for getting the document could no longer get their hands on it, but had to be content with the photocopy given to you, which by the way was stolen from you by H. Jacob when you gave it to him for inspection and he gave you back an empty folded paper. 

97. He did not keep the document himself, but passed it on to that source which we still could not fathom. 

So Meier had the "evidence" but for the umpteenth time it got lost... ? Meier's photo negatives and films got lost as well! As with Meier's claim that he found the original Bible in a tomb in Israel! And at the same time Meier and his alleged ETs have the balls to use the word "truth." So, how do you polish an intellectual turd of thought? With lies upon lies upon lies...

Happy Shark

 Who's for genetically altering sharks?

Wendelle Stevens on The Billy Meier Case - They Lie!

Excerpt from the article The Analysis: Why Billy Meier's Pleiadians Lie And Disinform.

The perspective of Colonel Wendelle Stevens

It is necessary to add that one of the first who referred to the discrepancies in the Pleiadians´ teaching was the now deceased and key UFO researcher Air Force Colonel Wendelle Stevens. He led the first research team INTERCEP which in 1976 examined in detail Billy Meier´s case with help of the latest technological devices at that time. Within the frame of submitted evidence the INTERCEP reached the conclusion that all attempts failed to find that the case was a hoax or resulting from false activity. They tended to the conclusion that Billy Meier is a genuine contactee. However, sometime later Stevens in the interview with journalist Bret Leuder for UFO Magazine (June, 2007) said that Pleiadians had lied:

Leuder: So why has Semjase changed her story so many times?

Stevens: “That has bothered me a great deal, because to me, she’s lying. As I look at it now, they had an objective for Meier and they didn’t want him to stray from their objective. So they told him what they wanted him to know and believe. …So I think they have the entire truth but didn’t want him to be distracted by other interests. For instance, they told him that George Adamski was a man, but he was a charlatan and liar. Then later they told him that it wasn’t Adamski´s story at all, and he was borrowing the story from another man. And they gave him a name for who really had those experiences. So Adamski was pirating the story. Then later still they told him that maybe he did have those experiences, but they weren’t all very accurate. There are other examples. Every time he would find something interesting, she would discourage it. Then later she (Semjase) would come along and say: «Well, maybe there was more to it than that, but you don’t need to know anything about that». So I’m convinced that they don’t always tell him the intrinsic truth. They tell him what they want him to believe.“

(New) 1952 George Adamski Multiple UFOs Photograph

 

From the website by Rene Olsen.